<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adsense is Broken</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/</link>
	<description>Pathologically Entrepreneurial</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>@nivi I suppose it is self-correcting...  But I think the specter of click-fraud is enough to scare a lot of advertisers away.  It&#039;s never a really great value proposition to say:

&quot;I know some percentage of what I&#039;m offering is pure and utter crap....  But because of that, I&#039;ve marked the price WAY DOWN!&quot;

For &quot;pro&quot; advertisers, this is probably fine.  Just measure it, and make sure your ROI is solid.  But I wonder how many adsense advertisers really measure how many click-thrus convert and are savvy enough to have differentiated measurement for search ads and content ads?

I dunno.  Maybe Google&#039;s PPA advertising will take off in the content network...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nivi I suppose it is self-correcting&#8230;  But I think the specter of click-fraud is enough to scare a lot of advertisers away.  It&#8217;s never a really great value proposition to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;I know some percentage of what I&#8217;m offering is pure and utter crap&#8230;.  But because of that, I&#8217;ve marked the price WAY DOWN!&#8221;</p>
<p>For &#8220;pro&#8221; advertisers, this is probably fine.  Just measure it, and make sure your ROI is solid.  But I wonder how many adsense advertisers really measure how many click-thrus convert and are savvy enough to have differentiated measurement for search ads and content ads?</p>
<p>I dunno.  Maybe Google&#8217;s PPA advertising will take off in the content network&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auston</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Auston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>There is always &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tipjoy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tipjoy&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is always <a href="http://www.tipjoy.com/" rel="nofollow">Tipjoy</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nivi</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Nivi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t this be self-correcting though? Advertisers will simply pay less for click-throughs as the quality of click-throughs goes down. Or no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t this be self-correcting though? Advertisers will simply pay less for click-throughs as the quality of click-throughs goes down. Or no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
