<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adsense is Broken</title>
	<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/</link>
	<description>Pathologically Entrepreneurial</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>@nivi I suppose it is self-correcting...  But I think the specter of click-fraud is enough to scare a lot of advertisers away.  It's never a really great value proposition to say:

"I know some percentage of what I'm offering is pure and utter crap....  But because of that, I've marked the price WAY DOWN!"

For "pro" advertisers, this is probably fine.  Just measure it, and make sure your ROI is solid.  But I wonder how many adsense advertisers really measure how many click-thrus convert and are savvy enough to have differentiated measurement for search ads and content ads?

I dunno.  Maybe Google's PPA advertising will take off in the content network...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nivi I suppose it is self-correcting&#8230;  But I think the specter of click-fraud is enough to scare a lot of advertisers away.  It&#8217;s never a really great value proposition to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;I know some percentage of what I&#8217;m offering is pure and utter crap&#8230;.  But because of that, I&#8217;ve marked the price WAY DOWN!&#8221;</p>
<p>For &#8220;pro&#8221; advertisers, this is probably fine.  Just measure it, and make sure your ROI is solid.  But I wonder how many adsense advertisers really measure how many click-thrus convert and are savvy enough to have differentiated measurement for search ads and content ads?</p>
<p>I dunno.  Maybe Google&#8217;s PPA advertising will take off in the content network&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auston</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Auston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>There is always &lt;a href="http://www.tipjoy.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tipjoy&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is always <a href="http://www.tipjoy.com/" rel="nofollow">Tipjoy</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nivi</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Nivi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/adsense-is-broken/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Shouldn't this be self-correcting though? Advertisers will simply pay less for click-throughs as the quality of click-throughs goes down. Or no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t this be self-correcting though? Advertisers will simply pay less for click-throughs as the quality of click-throughs goes down. Or no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
