http://www.tonywright.com/2008/come-see-me-speak-at-the-churchill-club/ Pathologically Entrepreneurial Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:00:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://www.tonywright.com/2008/come-see-me-speak-at-the-churchill-club/#comment-443 Sean Murphy Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:17:26 +0000 http://www.tonywright.com/2008/come-see-me-speak-at-the-churchill-club/#comment-443 Jonathan Spira spoke more than 50% of the time and it was based on either "self-report surveys" or "anecdotal evidence." You have real data based on an independent non-intrusive mechanism (aside from whatever Hawthorn effect may arise from the fact that you know you are being monitored). You should be more direct in reporting what you've learned. It's very difficult to measure flow because it's so absorbing (the act of trying to record it pulls you out flow typically in "timer based" reporting schemes). You have an opportunity for much more accurate numbers and therefore more accurate inferences and analysis based on real behavior (at the computer). This strikes me as an enormous opportunity and something you should address more directly next time you speak. Jonathan Spira spoke more than 50% of the time and it was based on either “self-report surveys” or “anecdotal evidence.” You have real data based on an independent non-intrusive mechanism (aside from whatever Hawthorn effect may arise from the fact that you know you are being monitored). You should be more direct in reporting what you’ve learned. It’s very difficult to measure flow because it’s so absorbing (the act of trying to record it pulls you out flow typically in “timer based” reporting schemes). You have an opportunity for much more accurate numbers and therefore more accurate inferences and analysis based on real behavior (at the computer). This strikes me as an enormous opportunity and something you should address more directly next time you speak.

]]>