<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Startups: Launch Early, but Launch Small?</title>
	<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/</link>
	<description>Pathologically Entrepreneurial</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>sorry "a slightly different story Kraus has told"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry &#8220;a slightly different story Kraus has told&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-330</guid>
		<description>A slightly different Kraus has told in a public forum was that they signed up over 3,000 people for the beta and let it run for more than nine months. 

Everyone had free use of the application and the developers were happy because they were getting a lot of testing. When it came time to convert to paid they had an extremely low yield (either less than 2% or less than 0.5% I can't remember) and they had to re-tool completely to figure out how to find paying customers. They ultimately revamped their signup process so that you had to give a credit card to start your 15 day free trial:  this cut way down on their trails but boosted their conversion rate significantly and allowed them to focus on what kind of trial users converted at the high frequency.

Steve Blank makes a related point in "&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Four-Steps-Epiphany-Steven-Blank/dp/0976470705" rel="nofollow"&gt;Four Steps to the Epiphany&lt;/a&gt;" when he cautions startup teams to distinguish between beta for product development and customer development. You need to test your product, but you also need to test your product concept--will people pay for it, how many people and how much will they pay. He observes that many startups fail because they can't find a market, few fail because they can't get their product to function.

Beta for test and beta for market exploration have two different goals. The number of early product testers you need may be two or three orders of magnitude less than the number you need to refine your product concept to the point you find market acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A slightly different Kraus has told in a public forum was that they signed up over 3,000 people for the beta and let it run for more than nine months. </p>
<p>Everyone had free use of the application and the developers were happy because they were getting a lot of testing. When it came time to convert to paid they had an extremely low yield (either less than 2% or less than 0.5% I can&#8217;t remember) and they had to re-tool completely to figure out how to find paying customers. They ultimately revamped their signup process so that you had to give a credit card to start your 15 day free trial:  this cut way down on their trails but boosted their conversion rate significantly and allowed them to focus on what kind of trial users converted at the high frequency.</p>
<p>Steve Blank makes a related point in &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Four-Steps-Epiphany-Steven-Blank/dp/0976470705" rel="nofollow">Four Steps to the Epiphany</a>&#8221; when he cautions startup teams to distinguish between beta for product development and customer development. You need to test your product, but you also need to test your product concept&#8211;will people pay for it, how many people and how much will they pay. He observes that many startups fail because they can&#8217;t find a market, few fail because they can&#8217;t get their product to function.</p>
<p>Beta for test and beta for market exploration have two different goals. The number of early product testers you need may be two or three orders of magnitude less than the number you need to refine your product concept to the point you find market acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>One thing that's nice about opening up to a small crowd first, like I did with &lt;a href="http://catchthebest.com/" title="hiring software" rel="nofollow"&gt;Catch the Best&lt;/a&gt;, is that you don't get swamped with multiple reports of the same bug.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that&#8217;s nice about opening up to a small crowd first, like I did with <a href="http://catchthebest.com/" title="hiring software" rel="nofollow">Catch the Best</a>, is that you don&#8217;t get swamped with multiple reports of the same bug.  <img src='http://www.tonywright.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Im awaiting my competition...

Not easy launching brand new ideas and concepts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im awaiting my competition&#8230;</p>
<p>Not easy launching brand new ideas and concepts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Yaw, I struggle with the idea that you should invest any effort into keeping stealthy from your competition.

I don't see how you could launch anything but the tiniest and most secretive beta and not have your competition be able to ferret out what you're building.

I'm always stunned about how powerful the intertubes are from an investigative point of view.  For sites out there with ANY feature/market overlap with RescueTime, I will inevitably get a "have you seen this?" email from SOMEONE...  A friend, a user, etc.

I think to be stealthy enough to be effectively hidden from your competitors means that you functionally can't be out there AT ALL (which is more painful than the alternative).

Still, of course...  Competition seeing you is one thing.  Competition seeing you visibly kicking ass is another. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yaw, I struggle with the idea that you should invest any effort into keeping stealthy from your competition.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how you could launch anything but the tiniest and most secretive beta and not have your competition be able to ferret out what you&#8217;re building.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always stunned about how powerful the intertubes are from an investigative point of view.  For sites out there with ANY feature/market overlap with RescueTime, I will inevitably get a &#8220;have you seen this?&#8221; email from SOMEONE&#8230;  A friend, a user, etc.</p>
<p>I think to be stealthy enough to be effectively hidden from your competitors means that you functionally can&#8217;t be out there AT ALL (which is more painful than the alternative).</p>
<p>Still, of course&#8230;  Competition seeing you is one thing.  Competition seeing you visibly kicking ass is another. <img src='http://www.tonywright.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nivi</title>
		<link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Nivi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/startups-launch-early-but-launch-small/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Andrew Chen had some &lt;a href="http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/01/quantitative-ap.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;related thoughts&lt;/a&gt;
:

&lt;blockquote&gt;"And for the most part, until you've perfected your traction, why alert your potential competitors on what you're up to?"&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Chen had some <a href="http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/01/quantitative-ap.html" rel="nofollow">related thoughts</a><br />
:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;And for the most part, until you&#8217;ve perfected your traction, why alert your potential competitors on what you&#8217;re up to?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
