Mutual Awe

The best teams I’ve ever worked on have had a peculiar vibe of “mutual awe”. When I saw what my colleagues could pull off, I was dazzled. When I pulled off something cool, THEY were dazzled.

At the same time, I think it’s tremendously valuable to be a hobbyist in the areas where your partners are experts. I’ll never be a programmer, but I’ll always dabble– it helps me know what CAN be done. I’ll never be a salesguy (though I’ve been one), but I read books on how to sell. I’ll never be a writer, but I like to read about the art/science of writing good copy.

One of the blog entries that has stuck with me for a while is Guy Kawasaki’s post on workplace assholes (it even comes with a handy self-exam! (Are YOU one? Uh-oh. Am *I* one?!).

The main reason that the post/test stuck with me was one of the characteristics of workplace assholedom is this belief:

“I could do your job better than you’re doing.”

I’ve already sung the praises of small teams, but I’ll add this to the heap. The smaller the team, the greater to potential for mutual respect and/or awe. The larger the team, the greater the likelihood that SOMEONE on the team is thinking (or even saying) that they could make better design/coding/sales/biz decisions than the person who is currently making them.

Ironically, the larger the team, the greater the likelihood that they might be right.

People read this stuff?

Most of my personal hosting sites are hosted at a shared hosting company called Dreamhost. They’ve had some growing pains and certainly can’t handle any significant traffic, but they are a great host for dabbling (if I’m doing anything serious, like Jobby– now sold and gone– or RescueTime). They also have the benefit of hosting as many different domains as I want under my plan.

Dreamhost had some sort of hiccup after midnight last night, resulting in TonyWright.com being functionally dead in the water.

By the time I got in front of a computer this morning (9 hours later) I had 4 emails letter me know (3 from complete strangers). It’s heartening as hell to know that perfect strangers are trying to read my blog and making noise when it’s not available. Cool!

This charges me up to get back into blogging a bit, so stay tuned.

Oh No! Children are killing the planet!

(this is totally unrelated to anything I’ve blogged about before)

A friend sent me a link to an old article on SFGate.com about the environmental impacts of having children.

Two delightful excerpts:

“Hall and his colleagues found that a single new American born in the 1990s will be responsible, over his or her life, for 22 million pounds of liquid waste and 2.2 million pounds each of solid waste and atmospheric waste. He or she will have a lifetime consumption of 4,000 barrels of oil, 1.5 million pounds of minerals and 62,000 pounds of animal products that will entail the slaughter of 2,000 animals.”

Wow.

Another gem:

“In terms of energy usage alone, [which is] a convenient measure of environmental impact,” Knight says, “the average Ethiopian uses one 310th of what we use. So when an American couple stops at two kids it’s like an Ethiopian couple stopping at 620.”

This makes me wonder at the irony of passionate environmentalists driving around a couple of kids in their Prius’. It also makes me wonder if every single dollar we spend on environmentalist causes oughtn’t be redirected to things like birth control education, birth control research, and free vasectomies.

The right to freely reproduce is so sacrosanct in this world (and especially in the US) that people get REALLY uncomfortable when discussing (or even thinking about) the relative immorality of reproduction.

RELATIVE. I’m not going to go so far as goofiness like the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement. I’m all for continuation of the species. But can we set aside our love of sex, pregnancy, childbirth, and parenthood and think about the consequences of our actions?

One parting thought. When I talk a bit about the fact that my wife and I don’t have any plans to have children, most parents sadly shake their heads. “You don’t know the joy that you’re missing” or “You’re going to be so lonely when you’re old,” are common responses. From what I can tell from this article, there is no apparent relationship between having children and happiness/contentment/satisfaction (the only exception being if you WANT to have children but cannot).

(for the record, I eat meat, drink from paper cups, drive when I feel like it, and occasionally don’t recycle. So I’m throwing stones from a bit of a glass house, here)

Crappy (and overpriced) logos and saying what you mean

Cost per pixel?With much pageantry and fanfare, the 2012 Olympics logo has been unleashed upon the world, and it appears to be a disaster. It reminds of another logo debacle back in my home town.

My favorite bit of coverage on the logo is (predictably) from Seth Godin, who talks about the accompanying quote on the press release:

“This is the vision at the very heart of our brand,” said London 2012 organising committee chairman Seb Coe.

“It will define the venues we build and the Games we hold and act as a reminder of our promise to use the Olympic spirit to inspire everyone and reach out to young people around the world.

“It is an invitation to take part and be involved.”

What the HELL does that even mean?

It reminds me of the book I’m reading (and continue to be bowled over by)… “Made to Stick” by the brothers Heath. One of the stickiest passages in the book is when they talk about John F. Kennedy saying “”I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth.” The Heaths suggested that nowadays a statement like that would’ve gotten thoroughly mangled by corporate wordsmiths to read more like “The United States will leverage our aeronautical expertise and our commitment to scientific excellence to achieve what we feel is a laudable goal for this decade. Our actions need to reflect the promise of our established national brand. The support this brand, we invite the world to watch us and be inspired as we begin the 10-year process of getting to the moon.”

When you start throwing around big money for branding and having your corporate spin doctors pile on the double-speak, it can feel pretty damn manipulative. And now that anyone can voice their opinion on these wonderful intertubes of ours, the people who feel manipulated can let you know how they feel. Well, as London 2012 organising committee chairman Seb Coe says, “It is an invitation to take part and be involved.”

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  Scroll to top