The Fuss About Macs, Priming, and Racism

Alan Steele (ex-Jobster colleague) tweets:

“using a mac for the first time in many years. so far i don’t see what all the fuss is about. it’s just another desktop…”

I tend to agree. A computer is a means to an end, and an XP Windows box usually gets me to my “end” just fine.

There are certainly some differences among the platforms, but I think it mostly comes down to how the Mac makes the user FEEL (which is partially a UI thing and partially a marketing coup by Apple). [Note: During the writing of this meandering post, my PC made me feel pretty annoyed by popping up a modal window prompting me to restart my fooking computer *3* times.]

Which leads me to one of my favorite blog posts by Seth Godin.

Aren’t convinced that Apple can manipulate your feelings? Think you’re above all that? You should check out the priming studies done by John Bargh. Here’s a good description of one (some lazy Googling only yielded one good overview– from some Christian blog. Please note: I am a Pastafarian and do not read Christian blogs if I can help it):

Bargh and several colleagues chose a group of undergraduates as subjects and gave them two scrambled-sentence tests. The first test was sprinkled with rude words like “disturb,” “bother,” and “intrude.” The second test was sprinkled with polite words like “respect,” “considerate,” and “yield.”

In both cases, the tests were indiscreet. None of the subjects picked up on the word trend consciously. But it primed them subconsciously.

After taking the five-minute test, students were asked to walk down the hall and talk to the person running the experiment about their next assignment. An actor was strategically engaged in conversation with the experimenter when the students would arrive. And the goal was to see how long it would take students to interrupt.

Bargh wanted to know if the subjects who were primed with polite words would take longer to interrupt the conversation than those primed with rude words. They thought the subconscious priming would have a slight affect. But the affect was pretty profound in quantitative terms.

The people primed with rude words interrupted, on average, after only five minutes. But 82% of the people primed with polite words never interrupted at all. Who knows how long they would have patiently and politely waited if the researchers hadn’t give the test a ten-minute time limit. [Note by Tony: Those damn ethics committees... Milgram would never be able to get away with his experiment today!]

From a product/marketing point of view, I’m forced to conclude that we’re getting “primed” every day in thousands of subtle ways… And that I’m probably as susceptible as the next guy.

We’re definitely getting off-topic here, but there’s another pretty frightening study about priming ((source)):

In a separate study, when African-American students were asked to identify their race on a pre-test questioner, the simple act of checking the box next to African American was enough to prime them with negative cultural stereotypes associated with African Americans and academic achievement. The number of items they got right was cut in HALF. Malcolm Gladwell makes a strong point that priming is a powerful thing. Personally I think this has incredible implications in our society. If ‘smart’ is really just a frame of mind, these social cues (such as African American=less intelligent) are shaping not only the results of standardized tests, but the way we interact with each other in business and other professional fields.

The idea that priming can actually effect performance on intelligence-based tests is pretty damn horrifying. Makes me think twice about the multicultural efforts we endured in school… Maybe we should be emphasizing our sameness rather than our differences (if those differences come with baggage that actually inhibit performance/success through priming)? Of course, it’d be better yet to get rid of the baggage.

So, er…. Returning to my original point, which was… Oh yeah! Something about Macs, right? Apple has invested considerable time and effort trying to understand how people want to feel and making damn sure their products (and their marketing) makes them feel that way. That (plus a marginally better OS with less legacy issues and less drivers to deal with) is what the fuss is about (IMO).

  • http://brian.fioca.com Brian Fioca

    Plus – macs run BSD.

  • http://csof.net Gene

    IMO, this post misses the point of the desktop UI experience being driven by Apple and followed by Microsoft, RedHat, Ubuntu, etc. That (along with sleek, modern design) is the “fuss”.

    Just like Apple got a boost on the shoulder of the Xerox Parc giant, Microsoft and others are inspired by Apple’s designers and engineers. Take a look at the “what’s new” list for Leopard and you’ll see what the rest of the pack will be busy with for the next few quarters.

  • http://csof.net Gene

    I must also admit to being a bit underwhelmed by Seth’s post, I wish his blog allowed comments to see how smart folks would argue his points in the margins…

    I think his feeling-over-doing theory holds up fine for many consumer-oriented companies and products, but Craigslist and Google have built valuble brands by “doing” not “feeling”. Apple combines both but they are not mutually exclusive, or even opposing, ideals.

  • http://www.davidadewumi.com David

    I’m Black and I’ve never once thought that after checking “African American” on a standardized test

    And considering those types of tests are my strong point (99% percentile in multiple tests) I doubt the validity of the study.

    On the other hand, I come from a mostly white, middle to upple class town, so maybe it is the race in the social/ cultural context.

    A black person taking the test in Camden, NJ (poorest city in the US) may feel different than a black person taking the test in San Jose, CA.

    Very interesting post though, on “priming.”

    By the way, an interesting research project (personal) I’ve been working on, is proving that ancient Egyptians were black.

    The reason being is that if a majority of people can agree (or at least a majority of black people) that ancient Egyptians were black, it could help change the mindset.

    Why? Well most scholars agree they were the most advanced civilization to walk the face of the Earth, and the longest-lasting too.

    Our belief systems derive from where we come from — my dad’s a University professor and is the smartest person I’ve ever met, so I would never think that black = less intelligent — we can prove that for black people (or any social, racial, or cultural group) are not genetically inferior (same goes with homosexuals, or any discriminated/ targeted group.

Recent Tweets
Categories